Skip to main content

Emotions at the Workplace - through a new lens of choice


 





This is not the first time that an article is being written about emotions at the workplace. However, this article has nothing to do with preaching you to manage your emotions at the workplace but everything to do with how you perceive those emotions at the workplace – yours and others’.

If you are a working professional with a little experience, you must have at least attended one corporate session by now on how to perform better in your organization or how to succeed in what you do or anything to the likes of learning to be better. And if you are a woman, you must have thought of or heard some other woman standing up in such a session and asking the question, “How do I convey my message assertively rather than aggressively?”

In my short years of working at professional organizations, I have heard this question plenty of times. However, I have heard this being asked only by women. This has nothing to do with the workplace environment but more to do with our subconscious beliefs. As women, anger is an emotion not very well received when displayed by us. 

Contrary to this is the fact that anger is still an emotion we often get to see at the workplace, sometimes mixed with disappointment and with frustration – not achieving your targets, not being able to communicate a message properly, your work plans being affected by unforeseen externalities - all these are bound to make a human being frustrated. 

Now this is a concept understood and accepted by most working people, especially men. Mostly, men do not worry about coming off as assertive or aggressive. They are mostly seen as "always assertive and occasionally angry". Which is again understandable going by the fact that sometimes things don’t go as expected.

For most females, owing to our social conditioning, we often worry about displaying the emotion anger and being labelled as aggressive instead of passionate. Our aggression often not understood. This is changing as more and more females join the workforce albeit at a slow pace. (Statistically, men are more likely to display aggression than women).

However, there is one emotion that if displayed in the workplace is still a major taboo for all genders alike, and that is- sadness. Often sadness is expressed by a little meltdown moment. Crying at the workplace still remains a major no-no.

I have heard plenty of times that we are not supposed to spill tears while working as if having a weak moment in the workplace is not only sacrilegious but also the end of one's career. Often this translates to people not expressing their grief even for the loss of a family member, especially during these times.

As a working professional, I can see why we should never cry at the organization - crying shows your weakness and makes you vulnerable and invites judgement from colleagues. And nobody wants to be vulnerable, not at a workplace where the competition is tough and there will always be people who would want to take your position at the slightest chance. Yet why does it resonate so much with the theme "men don't cry" - men taught at a young age to suppress their emotions often leading to poor mental health as an adult and outright denial of such dormant emotions? (Statistically, suicide rates are higher for men than women which is linked with their mental health).

This then comes from the subconscious beliefs that is imprinted on most men about how they should never shed tears. This belief then gets passed on to other genders too as they embrace the masculine environment of the workplace. (Statistically, women are more likely to cry than men. Statistically, gender ratio in the workforce is still skewed towards men. And hence, usage of the term “masculine environment” owing to dominant subconscious beliefs and behaviour patterns. So, offices where the number of women working are way higher than that of men, this may not be the case. Also, masculine environment implies the dominance of masculine energy despite the gender too. Energetically a single person has both masculine and feminine traits.)

However, as a writer and an alternative healing practitioner, I see a dire need for acceptance of all emotions by everyone in order to have an emotionally fulfilling life. Working a 9-to-5 job does not make us any less humans and any more robots. Are we then gradually becoming victims of toxic positivity as we keep denying anything and everything negative on our way and in our minds? If we are okay to display happiness for some achievement of ours then should not we be okay to spend a few minutes to be sad at our failures too?

Either that or we remain completely detached from the outcomes of our work and let neither success nor failure affect us. It is not impossible to detached by the outcomes from a 9-to-5 job... but then there goes your passion for a toss, and there goes the enthusiasm to achieve greater than you can imagine for a toss too. 

If you are a person whose career is their top priority in life, and who do not spend a lot of time in their hobbies or side-hustles, you would want to be passionate about your job-role and work projects. In that case, my only ask is if we are okay to display happiness, and partially okay to display anger, how about we are okay displaying sadness too? It is never wrong to attach yourself to the outcomes of your work. It is okay to be human and not a superhuman, to have desires and expectations from a job, business or work project.

We can either create a workplace that gracefully embraces all emotions, majorly classified as Happiness, Sadness, Fear, Disgust, Anger and Surprise, or resort to the policy of strict non-attachment and hence, a strict policy of 9 hours per day in the job only. Because otherwise where there is happiness, there will also be sadness, albeit repressed.

We already display the other emotions at work like fear and excitement. Strict policies incur fear into employees. There are many who operate by the fear of losing their jobs or reputation. Fear is a social instrument that way. We are excited about new opportunities- new job roles, new projects, new places, new organization, promotions, etc. We also like to surprise our team members with some rewards and recognition which excites them and motivates them further for future projects.

All these emotions make us human, bring our best selves to work and that work gives a sense of meaning and purpose to our lives.

You would probably be working around 35 years of your life for 9 hours per day at least. That’s 38% of the time of your day. If we exclude 8 hours for sleeping, we just are left with 29% of our day for personal goals and expressions. Do we then want to be completely ourselves in only these 29% of the day for the rest of 35 years of our working-lives? Or do we want to be wholly present and embrace all our emotions along with all our work projects for 100% of the day for the rest of 35 years of our working lives? Do we bring in our passion and authenticity to work or do we wear a mask for most of the day to come back home to our genuine ourselves? The choice to create our version of the ideal workplace environment is in our hands. What would you choose?




(The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. Pardon the usage of only male/female binary genders in the article since it is based on personal observation and related statistical information.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Liebster Blog Award I and II

So I just found it out today that  Geeta Nair  ( http://geetaavij.wordpress.com ) nominated me for  THE LIEBSTER BLOG AWARD  (liebster meaning “favourite” in German, which reminds me of the first German sentence I learnt - ich liebe dich :-D ) last year.  Also on the same month of November 2013, I was nominated for this award by  Bhavya Kaushik  ( http://bhavyakaushik.com / ) too.  I understand that I am too late in honouring the two nominations of the Liebster Award  but I am a big  fan of the saying – “ better late than never” , so I am going to accept it anyway. Rules of receiving the award : • To accept the award one must link back to the person who nominated him/ her. • Nominate 10 more bloggers who you feel are deserving of more subscribers. • Answer all questions posted by the nominator. • Create 10 questions for the nominees. • Contact the 10 nominees and inform them that they have been nominated for this prestigious award. I further nom

Tears of blood

[ The poem is written as a tribute and encouragement to the unfortunate rape victims of the society who are fighting every day to live with dignity.  This poem is published in  Read In Park ] Never had known pain, As I do now… Never knew what grief is, But I do now… When the morning sun knocks on my window, I weep silently recalling that loathsome night, When the rays fall on my wet pillow, I wail in self pity ending another sleepless night. Every morning I look into the mirror To see the detested face, Robbed, touched, raped, I now loathe my every single trace. I had begged for help, Had cried for mercy, But no one took a single step, That night to rescue me     They jeered at my pain, Laughed at my plight, “Men” they called themselves Those beasts of that night The fear that arouse in me, I fear it may bring my death Growing day by day, It questions my each breath The bruises on my face will heal, But the trauma ev

"Are You a Lesbian?"

“Are you a lesbian?” A friend of mine once asked me mockingly when we were discussing about my aversion from some (“some” not “all”) kind of men. “No. But does it matter?” I asked her scornfully. No, I wasn’t bothered that I was asked a question about my sexuality. But what I didn’t understand was that is being a lesbian a matter to be jeered about? What if I was one? Wouldn’t I be hurt and embarrassed that my sexuality was just mocked at? Why are the words “gay” or “lesbian” used as slangs? Another incident, that took place a couple of years back, was when I was teasing two girl friends of mine, accusing them of having an affair. I considered it as normal as teasing a guy and a girl. One of them found it so disrespectful that she, instead of simply denying the fact, chided that she isn’t of such “third class” standard. I later discussed the small argument that we had, with her, trying to make my point that being a lesbian or a transgender doesn’t define anyone’s cla